Women's rights in the U.S. Military

Bethany Niebauer — 2009-06-21T08:40:14Z

Within the military, women's rights in general are largely overlooked. Perhaps this is because when anyone joins the military she or he signs away quite a few of their rights. The fact that women lose a few more than men surprises no one – that's the way it is everywhere. A female helicopter pilot within the army recently told me that her male colleagues often made her feel unwelcome by “forgetting” to make her aware of last minute changes in plans and refusing to sit with her at meal times. A naval officer I spoke with confided that he did not approve of integrated (meaning men and women) crews and attributed higher rates of violence within such integrated crews to “[so many] women with synchronized cycles.”
The military is very fond of parading little tokens of femininity. They point to female mascots such as Molly Pitcher and Margaret Corbin. Being the spouse of a soldier is touted as the “toughest job in the army.” They like the idea of women's service. They like to toast the spouses at formal dinners and applaud them at deployment ceremonies. Like yellow ribbons on the backs of cars, these gestures mean little. The military is less appreciative of and less willing to accommodate women's actual service. It is unsurprising to learn that women who serve in the military and female family members of service members have their reproductive rights significantly curtailed. A woman facing an unwanted pregnancy who is tied to the military by marriage or by contract faces restricted access to the choices that were rightfully and legally hers before she got married or signed a contract.

While condoms are widely available for sale (and often given out for free in the Navy), base and post pharmacies are not required to stock emergency contraception and the majority of state side facilities choose not to, to say nothing of overseas installations. Because there is no law requiring that it be available, the choice in this instance is up to the base commander. In places like Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait emergency contraception is nearly impossible to obtain, while condoms are still relatively easy. The ubiquity of condoms compared to the rarity of emergency contraception is telling. While the military is very interested in protecting its male members from the risks of intercourse, they are clearly less invested in protecting their female members.

Female service members have almost no privacy when it comes to this issue. Pregnancy tests, while easily available stateside, are not reliably available to women serving in Iraq or Afghanistan. If a woman suspects she is pregnant and cannot get a home test she has to go to a medic who will prescribe one and if the results are positive, the medic will inform her chain of command. Whether or not she intends to continue the pregnancy is irrelevant. Pregnant service members who are deployed are immediately sent back to their normal duty stations. (I knew one woman serving in Iraq who took a pregnancy test in the morning, found out it was positive and was on a plane back to the United States that evening.) If she miscarries or terminates the pregnancy she will be sent back to wherever her unit is serving, thus providing plenty of fodder for the military's incessant rumor mill. She will likely be “slut-shamed” or shamed for making a choice with which her superiors might disagree. This in turn, damages her cohesion with her unit and raises her stress level, which raises her risk for suicide, something the military knows a lot about.

It's well known that the military has appalling rates of sexual assault particularly for women serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. As a woman living on an army installation, I had a much higher chance of being raped and murdered by my husband than anyone else. According to statistics released by the Department of Defense, the rate of sexual assault rose eight percent worldwide between 2008 and 2009 but rose 26% for women serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. Though alarming, these are just the numbers for reported assaults. According to the Department of Justice, 60% of sexual assaults are unreported. One has to wonder, how many rapes resulted in unwanted pregnancy? How many of those could have been prevented by emergency contraception? Why is the military so unwilling to make it available? Why are they so uninterested in protecting their sisters-in-arms? More importantly, why is the military so slow in creating a safe working environment for women? Why is it so hard?

Abortions in military hospitals cannot be performed except in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother. If the woman happens to be living or working stateside then she may be able to travel to a civilian provider to have the procedure. However, many military installations are in rural areas that have poor access to reproductive health care services already. Out of the five states with the highest number of military installations, four were given a grade of “D” or lower by NARAL Pro-Choice America regarding the availability of reproductive health care. The difficulties for women do not end there.

If said woman is living or working in one of the many, many overseas installations, she can try to obtain an abortion in that country (if it's legal and available), or she can travel home, losing time and money in the process. Furthermore, military health insurance only covers abortions performed to save the life of the mother. Rape and incest victims have to pay for any abortions themselves. (On a side note, the military's health care provider also refuses to cover forensic rape kits.) Abortion is legal for all American women unless that woman is living or working on an American base within a foreign country. It's a common joke that once you sign the papers to join a service, (or marry a service member), then that service “owns” you. This seems to be more true for women than it is for men. The ability to create life is one of the ways we define “woman,” and the military seems determined to inflict its arbitrary rules upon the lives of the women it owns.

Comment on Afghan Government's Rape Law

Bethany Niebauer — 2009-04-09T14:55:00Z

It's about Afghanistan's recent decision to legalize marital rape and it raises reasonable questions about why the United States is supporting a government that more and more resembles the Taliban. I thought we invaded to remove the Taliban, not elect them to high office.

I have to say that the outrage generated by this law infuriates me. I find it vastly hypocritical. In the United States there are thirty-three states that consider marital rape to be a lesser crime than stranger rape. This is especially appalling considering that nearly three quarters of rape victims know their attackers. Americans are angry because marital rape is legal in Afghanistan but we're complacent when the same crime is scarcely illegal in our own country. A woman is raped every three minutes and a woman is beaten every eighteen seconds. It's taken me about forty-five minutes to write this. Do the math yourself. It didn't happen half way around the world, or 3000 miles away or in the next state or the next town - it is happening now and it is happening in your neighborhood. You probably know a rape victim. You probably know a rapist.

Before this law was passed what were the chances that a victim of marital rape could prosecute her husband in court? Notice I said "prosecute" not "convict." What were the chances that a victim of any kind of rape could prosecute her attacker in court? Women are blamed for being raped in our culture and in Afghan culture. Under sharia, (which I refuse to capitalize), law a woman needs four witnesses to prove her crime took place. In Afghanistan and other countries, women are the ones who go to jail for rape and they go to jail in staggering quantities yet you would be hard-pressed to find a rapist in these jails. What does this tell us? It tells us that rape is acceptable and that the people who write the laws, (ie men), believe women exist to be fucked by men.

Some men are going to read this and call me to tell me that not all men rape. They're going to tell me that they are appalled by rape. They're going to tell me how guilty they feel that other men rape. I want to tell these men that they are the ones who are in charge and that the guilt they feel strongly resembles acquiescence to a situation they don't care to change.

In places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iraq women are commodities. If one of them is perceived to be damaged she is thrown away or destroyed and no one is likely to care. She is property and if one wife is "polluted" through rape it's no big deal because you can go out and buy another one. This is about the control of women, about ensuring and enabling sexual access to them and about keeping them as reproductive slaves. I am not outraged by Afghanistan's recent decision. I am barely surprised.

Do you want to do something about this situation? Send some money to the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan. Rest assured that even though they are revolutionary they are non-violent. (Though I wouldn't mind if they started throwing the occasional molotov-cocktail and if they did I might run away and join them). If you prefer to help women in the U.S.A, send some money to RAINN.

**I wrote this with help from Andrea Dworkin. I can do that because it's not like anyone who reads my blog has read her.

Kabulpress comments on the Afghan government's “Rape Law”

More evidence of re-Talibanization of Afghanistan/ Just as Karzai has said he will review the constitutionality of the Personal Status Law, so should Barack Obama and the United States Congress review the decision to send more troops and funds to support this Afghan government.

Thursday 9 April 2009, by Kamran Mir Hazar, Robert Maier

کابل پرس

Women's rights in the U.S. Military

Comment on Afghan Government's Rape Law